CROWN/2026/0000005 Written representations
Showing 301 to 400 of 491 representations, newest first.
Results per page 25 | 50 | 100Redacted representation comment
Submitted by: Interested party
Date submitted: 4 August 2026
Iβve lived in Gosport Hampshire for 60 years and simply donβt want this removal centre especially adding it to 600 beds . It completely destroys the whole landscape of the area . No - to 600 inmates.
Submitted by: Interested party
Date submitted: 4 August 2026
I wholly agree with the development of this.
Submitted by: Interested party
Date submitted: 4 August 2026
I would like to make it clear from the outset that my concerns are not with the existence of an Immigration Removal Centre itself. I purchased my property knowing that the site had historically operated as such, and I recognise that facilities of this nature have an important role. My concerns relate specifically to the scale and impact of the proposed redevelopment and expansion. The proposal represents a significant intensification of the siteβs use. In particular, I am concerned about: ... Read more
Submitted by: Interested party
Date submitted: 4 August 2026
I object strongly to the expansion of the IRC in Fort Road, Gosport Hampshire. The planned development has expanded exponentially since its original use as an immigration centre. Gosport itself is a peninsula with years of traffic issues due to the layout of the borough. The IRC is situated in a peninsula within a peninsula and accessed by three pinch points. Haslar Brigde which is effectively one way, Clayhall Road where limited household parking again is single file making it effectively one w... Read more
Submitted by: Interested party
Date submitted: 4 August 2026
The site should never of been expanded, Gosport cannot take the extreme extension, waste , water roads ( which are already struggling especially the access in and out of Gosport. The Fareham sewage system is already struggling with the new homes being erected let alone the hundreds that are supposedly going to be housed . The next is security , keeping the immigrants inside, no day release and threat by some who are known to be violent ie reason they are being deported
Submitted by: Interested party
Date submitted: 4 August 2026
The car park purchased from the council isnβt large enough for all the workers and visitors. Cars will end up clogging residential streets.
Submitted by: Interested party
Date submitted: 4 August 2026
The original proposal for 130 beds was exactly what the site was designed for. To increase to 600 beds with 3 storey high accommodation is not suitable for the location. Those living on Fort Road, will have their privacy ruined, their homes will drop in value and their lives changed for the worse. This is after the years of continuous building, noise pollution and increased traffic to bring the site up to what is proposed. Utterly shocking decision by central government. I do not wish to attend ... Read more
Submitted by: Interested party
Date submitted: 4 August 2026
I wish to object to the proposed development of the Haslar Immigration Centre because I believe it would have a significant negative impact on the surrounding community, local infrastructure, and the character of the area. My concerns relate to planning matters rather than immigration policy, and I ask that these issues are given careful consideration during the planning process. Firstly, the proposed development would place additional pressure on local public services and infrastructure. The... Read more
Submitted by: Interested party
Date submitted: 4 August 2026
The hole idea of putting a I.R.C.in such a congested area is beyond me before we start getting into the way it will effect the local area and the residents. The three storey buildings that are planned and were not on the original application are completely out of contextual harmony. The height of these buildings mean that the local residents who live straight across the road will have people who are locked up looking straight into their homes. ( somebody in London who has to decide this applica... Read more
Submitted by: Interested party
Date submitted: 4 August 2026
My objections to phase two of the Haslar IRC are as follows; There is no other IRC of this size in such very close proximity, in fact actually next door, to residents any where else in the country. Therefore stating facts that there has been no noise disturbance, security breaches, vehicle disturbances to residents, light pollution, inconsiderate vehicle parking, obtrusion of residents privacy etc can not be stated as fact. there is no precedent to base this on. THIS IS THE ONLY IMMIGRATION ... Read more
Submitted by: Interested party
Date submitted: 4 August 2026
The roads and infrastructure in our area is already overloaded and can't take the extra traffic from either the construction or the running of the centre If the government saw through thier promises on immigration , this Centre won't be needed anyway
Submitted by: Interested party
Date submitted: 4 August 2026
I would like to attend a hearing. I am a resident of a property within 500m of the HIRC development. I have considerable concerns on the proposed development from the inevitable impact on both the local community and from a personal perspective. There are also local government and national government aspects to consider . Local Community Impact. There is a significant likelihood of local protest similar to those protests seen elsewhere in the country. The prospect of this is frighten... Read more
Submitted by: Interested party
Date submitted: 4 August 2026
Regularly cycle in the Haslar area to get to Portsmouth from Lee on the Solent The access roads are narrow, this is in a residential area, bringing in and taking out this number of detainees with the increased number of staff to manage the centre will have a negative impact on the roads in the area Unless it has own health care staff and centre this many people requiring healthcare will impact on Queen Alexandra hospital which canβt cope with existing population
Submitted by: Interested party
Date submitted: 4 August 2026
This will have a massive negative impact on a small community that is already overstretched on public services and infrastructure!
Submitted by: Interested party
Date submitted: 4 August 2026
I strongly object to the proposed Immigration Removal Centre at Haslar. I believe this development is inappropriate for our community and will have a detrimental impact on residentsβ sense of safety, place additional pressure on local policing and public services, and change the character of the area. The proposal has not demonstrated that the existing infrastructure and security arrangements are sufficient to mitigate these concerns, and I therefore urge the application to be refused.
Submitted by: Interested party
Date submitted: 4 August 2026
I appose these new plans as it is going to bring so much negativity to our town we love. It is not to be now for negative reasons. Also the poor people this is directly effecting their property and fear for their safety in their own homes
Submitted by: Interested party
Date submitted: 4 August 2026
Redacted representation comment
Submitted by: Interested party
Date submitted: 4 August 2026
Objection to the Proposed Expansion of the IRC Building I wish to formally object to the proposed expansion of the IRC building. Firstly, I believe the proposed increase in capacity is far too great and is not something that has the support of many people within our local community. An expansion of this scale would place significant additional pressure on the surrounding area and fundamentally change the character of our neighbourhood. Secondly, I strongly object to the proposal to incr... Read more
Submitted by: Interested party
Date submitted: 4 August 2026
This will impact the local area in a number of detrimental ways. 1. Noise pollution - arrivals and departures at all hours. At any point there may be over 1000 people in the facility and that alone will increase noise. 2. Light pollution - the pure scale of the buildings will affect the light. The security lighting alone will damage the right to light. The light pollution will be increased with road traffic. 3. Environmental pollution caused by increased vehicles and engines 4. Unsa... Read more
Submitted by: Interested party
Date submitted: 4 August 2026
I strongly object to the increase in occupant capacity . I think it will effect the surrounding area, noise , traffic and house prices, which will effect me as I live very near the site . The last thing Gosport needs is a large immigration prisonI think it will be the last nail in the coffin . I donβt believe for one minute that there will be a lot of jobs for local people . Just think itβs the worse thing ever .All the money they have spent , could have been used to change the site to flats and... Read more
Submitted by: Interested party
Date submitted: 4 August 2026
As a local resident I object most strongly to the development of the Haslar Immigration Centre. Reasons include: β’ Influx of more people which Gosport cannot support. β’ The site and scale of this development is not in keeping with the historic area. β’ Severe traffic congestion on an already congested peninsular. β’ Pressure on local NHS facilities. Already struggle to get GP appointments and extremely long waiting lists at QA hospital. β’Gosport is a deprived town since the MOD pulled out. T... Read more
Submitted by: Interested party
Date submitted: 4 August 2026
This application far exceeds what has been agreed by the Gosport Council who are elected by the local people we the Gosport people are agai st this establishment which is trapped on a very small inlet on an inlet with one two ways out by road which is already over populated.
Submitted by: Interested party
Date submitted: 4 August 2026
As my previous submission has not been published on this list, I am submitting it again. Please find the full document attached as a PDF including supporting diagrams and images. I object wholeheartedly to the expansion of Haslar Immigration Removal Centre. I do not think you realise just how close neighbouring homes are and how much this proposal will detrimentally affect the lives of those living on the perimeter. Access is entirely unsuitable on Fort Road, directly adjacent and opposite res... Read more
Submitted by: Interested party
Date submitted: 4 August 2026
Contains attachment(s)
Redacted representation comment
Submitted by: Interested party
Date submitted: 4 August 2026
I am writing as a local resident directly affected by the proposed redevelopment at Haslar IRC to register my strongest formal objection to the Phase 2 expansion proposal, which seeks outline planning permission to add 470 extra beds to the site (bringing the total capacity to 600 beds). While I recognize the Crown Development route bypasses standard local authority determination, the Home Office must still comply with the National Planning Policy Framework (NPPF) and the Gosport Borough Local ... Read more
Submitted by: Interested party
Date submitted: 4 August 2026
The size of the structure,not fair on local residents. Ho many people will it hold and will they be male female and children? Will it house people that have been in prison for sexual or violent crimes ? What company will be in charge of security. Will these persons be confined and not free to leave the unit ? Is there a guarantee that it will never become an open facility.
Submitted by: Interested party
Date submitted: 4 August 2026
The infrastructure of Gosport is very poor as it is so extra pressure on these services will be intolerable. The poor people who live on Fort Road will look out on a three storey building which will be lite all night. The original proposal was tolerable the new proposals are not.
Submitted by: Interested party
Date submitted: 4 August 2026
Yes I wish to attend a hearing, if The Crown allows? My town, and where this building stands is in a small peninsula, and cannot sustain the traffic, noise to residents, and pressure on all our services doctors , hospitals that are barely able to keep on top for us, that live here, and pay our dues. I have walked the route around this building all my life, and swam from the seawall, and now walk with my dog it is very frightening knowing this is being railroaded without including the reside... Read more
Submitted by: Interested party
Date submitted: 4 August 2026
Contains attachment(s)
Not to mention the cost of this? What about the surveillance of the people there and the has there been any consideration of the safety of the surrounding population? I have grandchildren living there who have just begun making their own lives and I am very worried regarding their safety when being out on their own. What are they all going to be doing, properly using our money for their entertainment or loitering about in the area. This is just disgusting to just put this amount of completely un... Read more
Submitted by: Interested party
Date submitted: 4 August 2026
I oppose the home office plan to increase the height of the new buildings at Haslar IRC. The original plan was for a substantially lower building which local people had accepted. It seems the government have totally ignored the wishes of local residents. I understand the need for the facility, but the increase in size and capacity seems inconsiderate and badly planned. Gosport is a peninsula and does not have adequate infrastructure and services to support the proposed increase in population... Read more
Submitted by: Interested party
Date submitted: 4 August 2026
This is not fair on us residents of gosport. Moving the goal posts without our input is disgraceful, we dont want the IRC at all, let alone its expansion done behind our backs. The government and home office are supposed to represent and work in the interests of the British public. This is not a 28 day stay location thats clear with the level of facilities it will have. Its a disgrace this is OUR TOWN, OUR MONEY! remember who you work for! This backdoor change will ruin the landscape of gospor... Read more
Submitted by: Interested party
Date submitted: 4 August 2026
Dear Inspector, I wish to submit this objection to Crown Development Application CROWN/2026/0000005 in my personal capacity as a resident. Having carefully reviewed the application documents, I do not believe the applicant has demonstrated that the proposed expansion of Haslar Immigration Removal Centre can be delivered without causing unacceptable planning harm. My objection is based entirely upon material planning considerations rather than wider immigration policy. Whilst each issue is s... Read more
Submitted by: Interested party
Date submitted: 4 August 2026
Redacted representation comment
Submitted by: Interested party
Date submitted: 4 August 2026
Redacted representation comment
Submitted by: Interested party
Date submitted: 4 August 2026
The proposal of the extension of this immigration centre is of great concern to myself and local residents. Firstly the impact on local nhs services it is difficult as a local trying to get a doctors appointment and nhs dentists that we have already have full books with waiting lists. Living locally the impact of daily traffic in and out of town will make car travel a fight for the road, it is bad enough now trying to navigate abandoned work vehicles left on Fort Road and Haslar Road. Haslar i... Read more
Submitted by: Interested party
Date submitted: 4 August 2026
Yes, I would like to attend if an event is scheduled. I am writing to register a formal objection to the Home Office planning application for Phase 2 of the redevelopment of Haslar Immigration Removal Centre (Haslar IRC), which proposes increasing the siteβs capacity to 600 beds and introducing four new three-storey accommodation buildings. My objections are as follows: Height, scale, and design: The proposed three-storey blocks would significantly alter the character and skyline of t... Read more
Submitted by: Interested party
Date submitted: 4 August 2026
Raising concerns over the proposals for phase 2 for the Haslar Immigration Removal Centre. Living very local to the IRC I am concerned over the construction of the building to reach 3 stories. Negatively impact on the aesthetics and character of the area. Furthermore, the lack of clarity and planning for transport to and from the facility. Will cause further disruption with traffic congestion and noise throughout and day and night. There is limited parking available and this is exacerbate the is... Read more
Submitted by: Interested party
Date submitted: 4 August 2026
I object to this development as the 160 bed removal centre is now 600. Residents were not consulted on the expansion. The area can not facilitate this amount of traffic in the area. Public spaces have been commandeered without approval from residents. Homes in the local area will be overlooked and their value decreased because of this monstrosity. The area will be at risk from detainees escaping from the facility as they do from prisons.
Submitted by: Interested party
Date submitted: 4 August 2026
Redacted representation comment
Submitted by: Interested party
Date submitted: 4 August 2026
Why haven't local people been consulted on the expansion of the IRC? The community around Fort Road and Clayhall Road is experiencing extreme building at the moment and we do not need further pressure on an already overstretched infrastructure.
Submitted by: Interested party
Date submitted: 4 August 2026
I object to the scale of the proposed detention centre and feel proper considerations have not been given to alternatives. The proposal would impact the natural environment and eco systems already in the balance with it's concreted area including extra traffic, parking etc as well as public access to the coast. It will impact demand for health care as the need of people in detention is significantly higher as healthy choices are less available to them. Furthermore, as a mental health professiona... Read more
Submitted by: Interested party
Date submitted: 4 August 2026
I feel strongly that I need to oppose this proposal, not because I am a racist spitting bile, but because I do not believe that Gosport - as a town, can take this influx. I believe that, should this proposal go through, it will overtake the town. We are a small community, many of us old or elderly and struggling within the existing framework. It is difficult enough now to get a Doctor appointment and Gosport is, at it's heart a small town with the infrastructure already creaking at the seams.... Read more
Submitted by: Interested party
Date submitted: 4 August 2026
Redacted representation comment
Submitted by: Interested party
Date submitted: 4 August 2026
Kate Alexander on behalf of Scottish Detainee Visitors
Dear Planning Inspectorate I am writing to object to the Home Officeβs proposal to expand Haslar Immigration Removal Centre in Gosport. The application reference is CROWN/2026/0000005. Haslar has not yet reopened. The Home Office says the refurbished centre would hold up to 130 people, with reopening expected in 2027. The current application seeks permission to add up to 470 more detention places, taking Haslar to a 600-bed detention centre. I write on behalf of Scottish Detainee Vis... Read more
Submitted by: Interested party
Date submitted: 4 August 2026
David Cranmer on behalf of DCC Town Planning
Please find attached an objection to the above application - as set out within the letter we would be interested in attending a Hearing or Inquiry.
Submitted by: Interested party
Date submitted: 4 August 2026
Contains attachment(s)
Jonathan Ellis on behalf of The Detention Forum
Dear Sir/ Madam, Please find attached the response from the Detention Forum to the planning application CROWN/2026/0000005
Submitted by: Interested party
Date submitted: 4 August 2026
Contains attachment(s)
Redacted representation comment
Submitted by: Interested party
Date submitted: 3 August 2026
I am writing to formally object to the proposed expansion of Haslar Immigration Removal Centre (IRC) in Gosport. My primary concern is the impact this expansion will have on public resources, particularly healthcare, at a time when local residents are already struggling to access basic NHS services. Healthcare at Haslar IRC is fully funded by NHS England using public money. This includes access to doctors, nurses, mental health services, dental care, and substance misuse treatment. Detaine... Read more
Submitted by: Interested party
Date submitted: 3 August 2026
I wish raise my objections to Crown Development Application CROWN/2026/0000005. I have a number of strong concerns around the phase 2 proposal for the Haslar IRC. These are material planning considerations. There are of course a significant number of additional issues that would not be considered as planning considerations. Redacted documents There are significant number of redacted documents relating to this proposal, this means that statutory consulates such as the local planning author... Read more
Submitted by: Interested party
Date submitted: 3 August 2026
Redacted representation comment
Submitted by: Interested party
Date submitted: 3 August 2026
Dear Planning Inspectorate, I am writing to object to the proposed expansion of Haslar Immigration Removal Centre. The application reference is CROWN/2026/0000005. I object because the proposal would expand Haslar into a 600-bed detention centre, adding up to 470 additional detention places before the refurbished 130-bed centre has even reopened or been tested in practice. I am especially concerned about flood risk, coastal safety, emergency evacuation and climate change. Haslar is a coastal ... Read more
Submitted by: Interested party
Date submitted: 3 August 2026
No I do not wish to attend a hearing. I have been working in this sector for over three and a half years and I fully support π― % this plan for expansion of this detention centre. Locally six hotels have been used to house migrants arriving by boat and the huge numbers across many different sites locally has caused the local area to become a very challenging place to live, and work. Many receive different services in different hotels and fights do breakout if one group perceives another hotel ... Read more
Submitted by: Interested party
Date submitted: 3 August 2026
Dear Planning Inspectorate, I am writing to object to the Home Officeβs proposal to expand Haslar Immigration Removal Centre in Gosport. The application reference is CROWN/2026/0000005. Haslar has not yet reopened. The Home Office says the refurbished centre would hold up to 130 people, with reopening expected in 2027. The current application seeks permission to add up to 470 more detention places, taking Haslar to a 600-bed detention centre. I am responding as someone part of a community... Read more
Submitted by: Interested party
Date submitted: 3 August 2026
Bob Sharples on behalf of Sport England
Thank you for consulting Sport England on the above application. However after reviewing the submission, Sport England does not wish to comment on the application.
Submitted by: Interested party
Date submitted: 3 August 2026
We as a community were told the buildings would not be erected any higher than the original. To be told this has changed without our knowledge is an absolute disgrace. I am completely opposed to this new development as it will spoil our beautiful town.
Submitted by: Interested party
Date submitted: 3 August 2026
Subject: Objection to Haslar IRC expansion, CROWN/2026/0000005 Dear Planning Inspectorate, I am writing to object to the proposed expansion of Haslar Immigration Removal Centre. The application reference is CROWN/2026/0000005. I object because the proposal would expand Haslar into a 600-bed detention centre, adding up to 470 additional detention places before the refurbished 130-bed centre has even reopened or been tested in practice. I am especially concerned about flood risk, coastal s... Read more
Submitted by: Interested party
Date submitted: 3 August 2026
Redacted representation comment
Submitted by: Interested party
Date submitted: 3 August 2026
I strongly object to the βPhase 2β expansion of the Haslar Immigration Removal Centre proposed at Crown Development Application CROWN/2026/0000005. I was previously a serving Councillor on Gosport Borough Council and at the first public engagement event by the MoJ/Home Office, we were assured that the IRC operation would solely cater for male detainees whose asylum applications had been determined and rejected, and that all detainees would be repatriated directly from the HASLAR IRC. It is no... Read more
Submitted by: Interested party
Date submitted: 3 August 2026
suzanne greenwood on behalf of Environment Agency
Redacted representation comment
Submitted by: Interested party
Date submitted: 3 August 2026
Contains attachment(s)
I would like to attend a hearing. My objections are contained in the attachment.
Submitted by: Interested party
Date submitted: 3 August 2026
Contains attachment(s)
It's so wrong to build a 3rd floor extension on the buildings at hasler. It will destroy a nice area. Just for people who won't be in this Country long. They should just double up in rooms.
Submitted by: Interested party
Date submitted: 3 August 2026
Dear Planning Inspectorate, I am writing to object to the proposed expansion of Haslar Immigration Removal Centre. The application reference is CROWN/2026/0000005. I object because the proposal would expand Haslar into a 600-bed detention centre, adding up to 470 additional detention places before the refurbished 130-bed centre has even reopened or been tested in practice. I am especially concerned about flood risk, coastal safety, emergency evacuation and climate change. Haslar is a coas... Read more
Submitted by: Interested party
Date submitted: 3 August 2026
Redacted representation comment
Submitted by: Interested party
Date submitted: 3 August 2026
I do not agree with this. Not good for local communities. I think it will look awful and Iβm concerned about security
Submitted by: Interested party
Date submitted: 3 August 2026
Dear Planning Inspectorate, I am writing to object to the Home Officeβs proposal to expand Haslar Immigration Removal Centre in Gosport. The application reference is CROWN/2026/0000005. Haslar has not yet reopened. The Home Office says the refurbished centre would hold up to 130 people, with reopening expected in 2027. The current application seeks permission to add up to 470 more detention places, taking Haslar to a 600-bed detention centre. I am responding as an immigration law practitioner... Read more
Submitted by: Interested party
Date submitted: 3 August 2026
Dear Planning Inspectorate, I am writing to object to the Home Officeβs proposal to expand Haslar Immigration Removal Centre in Gosport. The application reference is CROWN/2026/0000005. Haslar has not yet reopened. The Home Office says the refurbished centre would hold up to 130 people, with reopening expected in 2027. The current application seeks permission to add up to 470 more detention places, taking Haslar to a 600-bed detention centre. I am responding as someone working in human rights... Read more
Submitted by: Interested party
Date submitted: 3 August 2026
continued... Noise pollution. Staff entering and leaving the site during shift changeovers will create a great deal of noise. 414 staff create a lot of noise by talking, slamming vehicle doors, vehicle engines, mobile phone conversations, car stereos, car alarms etc. shift chaneovers will take place between 7am to 8am and 7pm to 8pm (transport assessment document p25), so staff are predicted to arrive from 6.30am. The level of noise created by this shift changeover on a daily basis is NOT accept... Read more
Submitted by: Interested party
Date submitted: 2 August 2026
Crown Development Application 0000005 I OBJECT wholeheartedly to the expansion of Haslar Immigration Removal Centre to increase capacity four-fold to 600 detainees. I do not think that you realise just how CLOSE our neighbouring homes are and how much this proposal will detrimentally affect our lives forever. The material reasons for my objection are as follows: 1. Access A new access point is proposed in Fort Road which was never historically an access point to the IRC site. When the Centre... Read more
Submitted by: Interested party
Date submitted: 2 August 2026
Crown Development Application 0000005 I OBJECT wholeheartedly to the expansion of Haslar Immigration Removal Centre to increase capacity four-fold to 600 detainees. I do not think that you realise just how CLOSE our neighbouring homes are and how much this proposal will detrimentally affect our lives forever. The material reasons for my objection are attached in the document submitted separately, as I was prevented from writing it all in this box. I would like to attend a hearing in the event... Read more
Submitted by: Interested party
Date submitted: 2 August 2026
Contains attachment(s)
I have no objection to this proposal. It's out of the way and as long as the people there are not mistreated it seems a constructive use of the area. Our MP owns a property nearby hence her sudden opposition.
Submitted by: Interested party
Date submitted: 2 August 2026
Redacted representation comment
Submitted by: Interested party
Date submitted: 2 August 2026
I am appalled that this development is being pushed through for possibly 600 inmates when the town cannot cope currently with it's own infrastructure for medical, housing and educational needs. I have no objection to having a centre there but the sheer size and disruption of it all will cause to local residents is something that has not been adequately considered. I am also worried that the coastal path will be restricted and this path is currently important for public access to the beautiful ... Read more
Submitted by: Interested party
Date submitted: 2 August 2026
Redacted representation comment
Submitted by: Interested party
Date submitted: 2 August 2026
This is a disgraceful use of this property with absolutely no consultation with local residents. I find that Govt. have to take full notice of local thinking and also of the local Council's thoughts and submissions !
Submitted by: Interested party
Date submitted: 2 August 2026
As a Gosport resident I object to the expansion of Haslar IRC. Regeneration of what is there is OK but the plans for new three storey building will be out of character for the area and disrupt the lives of the local residents, look unsightly, add additional traffic and noise issues to the area etc.
Submitted by: Interested party
Date submitted: 2 August 2026
I am unable to attend any hearing that may be scheduled but I wish to object to the proposed expansion of Haslar Immigration Removal Centre. My objection is based on the cumulative impact the development could have on the local community, infrastructure, environment, and the long-term future of Gosport. Firstly, I am concerned about the additional pressure this development could place on local roads, transport networks, emergency services, and other public infrastructure. Any increase in ... Read more
Submitted by: Interested party
Date submitted: 2 August 2026
I am objecting to scaling this facility to 600 beds before the initial 130 bed phase has been opened and operationally tested. The 3 storey accommidation blocks are significantly taller than historic local structures and harm the character of the area. Gosport is a peninsula and does not have the infrastructure to cope with the traffic & parking that will be needed for this many staff. This is a loss of potential local housing and affordable homes on a site desperately needed for community su... Read more
Submitted by: Interested party
Date submitted: 2 August 2026
Object to the proposed development, reasons are contained within the attached document.
Submitted by: Interested party
Date submitted: 2 August 2026
Contains attachment(s)
Redacted representation comment
Submitted by: Interested party
Date submitted: 2 August 2026
I object to Hasler's new development, the noise now keeps my disabled child up all night, parking is extremely limiting in the area, there are vulnerable people that live here, the disabled and the elderly in clayhall. The parking is a problem aswell, the security if frightening. 600 men will be there, they could get out at any point, there are women, children and families here, its terrifying.
Submitted by: Interested party
Date submitted: 2 August 2026
I object to the proposed expansion of Haslar Immigration Removal Centre. The application reference is CROWN/2026/0000005. The proposal would expand Haslar into a 600-bed detention centre, adding hundreds of additional detention places in a hasty and ill-conceived approach. Expanding Haslar would have serious human and community consequences both for the local community and for the people detained there. Rushing this misguided proposal could cause significant and avoidable harm to vulnerable p... Read more
Submitted by: Interested party
Date submitted: 2 August 2026
I strongly object to the proposed expansion of Haslar Immigration Removal Centre. The application reference is CROWN/2026/0000005. I object because the proposal would expand Haslar into a 600-bed detention centre, adding up to 470 additional detention places before the refurbished 130-bed centre has even reopened or been tested in practice. I am especially concerned about flood risk and healthcare. The Coastal Modelling Report prepared for the application gives sea-level rise estimates from a... Read more
Submitted by: Interested party
Date submitted: 2 August 2026
Redacted representation comment
Submitted by: Interested party
Date submitted: 2 August 2026
Redacted representation comment
Submitted by: Interested party
Date submitted: 2 August 2026
I am writing to object to the proposal identified under Planning Inspectorate reference CROWN/2026/0000005, particularly because it includes the construction of 3-storey accommodation blocks. I request that this objection be taken into account when determining the application. The proposed new expansion of the Haslar IRC will massively impinge on the original prison site. The almost perfectly preserved Napoleonic barracks, dating from 1803, are deservedly classed as a conservation area. To ... Read more
Submitted by: Interested party
Date submitted: 1 August 2026
As if the opening of the centre wasn't going to be enough of a strain on the local community this proposed extension and capacity increase will exacerbate the situation. This increase will mean more capacity, more staff, more traffic, more noise, more light pollution, etc. No extra facilities have been proposed to deal with all this and whilst I understand this facility must be somewhere this site is massively under facilitated to cope with this. I would be interested to attend any hearing regar... Read more
Submitted by: Interested party
Date submitted: 1 August 2026
It is ironic that I should be submitting my objection to 2026/0000005/CROWN, Haslar IRC, Gosport, the day after the Government's announcement of its Devolution Blueprint for Britain, in which it has sought to set out its desire to devolve decision making to a local level on the basis that Britain is considered to be "over-centralised". That the Home Office is seeking to bypass the local planning authority, whilst at the same time publicly boasting that the Government is handing back powers to l... Read more
Submitted by: Interested party
Date submitted: 1 August 2026
My objection is to the increase in numbers to be detained leading to a new extension plan because the new extension means the addition of three storey buildings. These are not compatible with this historic site. The extra height means not only are these top floors visible to residents and visitors to this area, but they will also overlook private residences and those walking along the sea wall. Although additional parking space is in the new plan, there will always be lots of extra traffic in a... Read more
Submitted by: Interested party
Date submitted: 1 August 2026
This is a perfect example of planning permission being granted then pushing for more. There is neither the infrastructure nor a comparable precedent for building 3 storeys in a residential area. No justification or consideration has gone into this at all. I strongly object. Yes I would like to attend.
Submitted by: Interested party
Date submitted: 1 August 2026
I strongly object to this planning application. There is not the infrastructure and transport links to support such a large number of prisoners. This is a lovely part of Gosport and building 3 storey buildings will ruin this and make it ugly.
Submitted by: Interested party
Date submitted: 1 August 2026
The key reasons that I object are: Height: the proposal to increase the height to three storeys have assured all that it would be limited to two: three are completely out of character with the area Access: the detention will have to be served by dozens of vehicles each day: staffing, food, rubbish disposal etch; yet it is served by only two narrow congested roads. Originally the staff would have been housed in the purpose built housing adjoining the site but these are now privately owned so s... Read more
Submitted by: Interested party
Date submitted: 1 August 2026
I object to the proposed expansion of Haslar Immigration Removal Centre (reference CROWN/2026/0000005). I am writing as a UK citizen with extreme concerns regarding human rights, in solidarity with those who have lived experience of detention. The proposal to expand Haslar into a 600-bed detention centre is inhumane, and will also be detrimental to the local community. The cruelty of detention is beyond the understanding of those who are involved in planning this expansion. I understand that... Read more
Submitted by: Interested party
Date submitted: 1 August 2026
I object to the proposed expansion of Haslar Immigration Removal Centre (reference CROWN/2026/0000005). I am writing as a UK citizen with extreme concerns regarding human rights, in solidarity with those who have lived experience of detention. The proposal to expand Haslar into a 600-bed detention centre is inhumane, and will also be detrimental to the local community. The cruelty of detention is beyond the understanding of those who are involved in planning this expansion. I understand that... Read more
Submitted by: Interested party
Date submitted: 1 August 2026
I am writing as a local resident to strongly object to the Home Officeβs application to expand the Haslar Immigration Removal Centre (IRC) in Gosport. The site has not even reopened for its initial 130 detainees, yet this proposal asks to add 470 more places, creating a massive 600-bed locked facility. This expansion is completely unsuitable for this location for the following reasons: Severe Flood Risk: Haslar sits on a coastal site partly in Flood Zone 3 and faces high surface water floo... Read more
Submitted by: Interested party
Date submitted: 31 July 2026
Redacted representation comment
Submitted by: Interested party
Date submitted: 31 July 2026
I object to the plans that were secretly put through without residents knowledge for another level to be added to this facility, as I have a young family living close by and this is extremely concerning. This matter has been sent from the top and taken out of local councillors hands. The public feel as though they do not have a say in what goes on in their town which is wrong on so many levels, are we are living in a dictatorship? This must be stopped.
Submitted by: Interested party
Date submitted: 31 July 2026
I worked in a classified environment. Redacted documents are made to protect sensitive information, what is so sensitive that a planning document has been be redacted? This leads to - What has the Home Office got to hide?
Submitted by: Interested party
Date submitted: 31 July 2026
Dear Planning Inspectorate, I am writing to object to the proposed expansion of Haslar Immigration Removal Centre. The application reference is CROWN/2026/0000005. I object because the proposal would expand Haslar into a 600-bed detention centre, adding up to 470 additional detention places before the refurbished 130-bed centre has even reopened or been tested in practice. I am especially concerned about flood risk, coastal safety, emergency evacuation and climate change. Haslar is a co... Read more
Submitted by: Interested party
Date submitted: 31 July 2026
I have concerns about the proposed 3 story buildings that are to be erected at the site. Not only will it be a great sadness to have these buildings towering over a very scenic area, my main concern is the loss of light to local residents. I have no objection to the site itself as it has been here many years. But for it to become such a dominant feature of our local community feels like an insult to the residents that we are not able to voice concerns about something so important in our very doo... Read more
Submitted by: Interested party
Date submitted: 31 July 2026