CROWN/2026/0000005 Written representations
Showing 76 to 100 of 491 representations, newest first.
Results per page 25 | 50 | 100I am concerned about these plans, the height proposed of the buildings and how it will impact my view which right now I can see the Isle of Wight, and afterwards I will not. This seems very unfair. I am concerned about how it will impact on the value of my apartment and my ability to sell. I am very concerned about the impact on traffic. Gosport already has a huge traffic problem particularly in rush hour. There are already big plans in pace to develop Haslar and Fort Blockhouse and the local ro... Read more
Submitted by: Interested party
Date submitted: 6 August 2026
Coastal Planning Team on behalf of Coastal Partners
Reference: CROWN/2026/0000005 Site Address: Haslar Immigration Removal Centre (IRC), Dolphin Way, Haslar, Gosport, PO12 2AW Proposed Development: Outline Planning Application with all matters reserved (except for access) for the expansion of Haslar IRC comprising the development of new accommodation blocks and ancillary supporting accommodation, the conversion and expansion of existing site infrastructure including internal roads, demolition of existing structures, minor amendment to coastal p... Read more
Submitted by: Interested party
Date submitted: 6 August 2026
Where is the shared humanity? The government should be spending time and money on finding better solutions; like safer secure routes in to the UK, proper support for those seeking asylum, building and maintaining infrastructure, tackling poverty, taxing the wealthy, reparations, global peace. I am against any IRC. What a repulsive way to treat a person. Immigration should always be welcomed! We ALL came to this country from somewhere else. Immigration is NOT the problem people 🙏
Submitted by: Interested party
Date submitted: 6 August 2026
Whacking a large three-storey prison in a small residential area when you'd told the residents the development would be a lot smaller was never going to be a good look, was it. I don't mind Phase 1. We live very near the IRC and didn't hear anything when it was in operation before. My main objection to Phase 2 is the fact that the government are indulging in shady behaviour and are trying to railroad through development which wasn't shown to any residents, councillors or the local planning o... Read more
Submitted by: Interested party
Date submitted: 6 August 2026
I strongly object to this oversized development, which is completely incompatible with our residential neighborhood. The ongoing construction is causing major daily disruption, with workers arriving in the early hours and blocking the street with their cars. This has left residents feeling trapped in an unlivable environment and unable to sell their homes. In particular, I object to the further expansion and proposed three-story buildings. They will directly overlook existing homes, causin... Read more
Submitted by: Interested party
Date submitted: 6 August 2026
Re: CROWN/2026/0000005 I object to the proposed expansion of Haslar Immigration Removal Centre. I object because the proposal would expand Haslar into a 600-bed detention centre, adding up to 470 additional detention places before the refurbished 130-bed centre has even reopened or been tested in practice. I am very concerned about flood risk, coastal safety, emergency evacuation and climate change. I know that part of the country well. Haslar is a coastal site next to the Solent, and par... Read more
Submitted by: Interested party
Date submitted: 6 August 2026
Redacted representation comment
Submitted by: Interested party
Date submitted: 6 August 2026
The roads are congested already so to move 600 people to the area would only exacerbate the issue. We are also a coastline community and placing such a tall and large building on that site spoils the view for a coastal community. Wrong size, wrong position.
Submitted by: Interested party
Date submitted: 6 August 2026
Redacted representation comment
Submitted by: Interested party
Date submitted: 6 August 2026
Maggie Heraty on behalf of United Against Inhumanity Association in the UK
UAI in the UK is a member of the Detention Forum and supports their objection to this proposal to increase the capacity of the Haslar Detention Centre. We would not wish to attend any hearing. We object principally because the proposed expansion would lead to serious consequences for an increased number of vulnerable people. There is a wealth of evidence that immigration detention can have severe effects on the mental and physical health of asylum seekers awaiting the resolution of their ... Read more
Submitted by: Interested party
Date submitted: 6 August 2026
Redacted representation comment
Submitted by: Interested party
Date submitted: 6 August 2026
I am writing as a local resident to express my concerns regarding the proposed accommodation centre being developed near my home. As a parent of two young children, my family’s safety is my highest priority. I am worried about the impact this development may have on our local community and, in particular, whether appropriate safeguarding, security, and management measures will be in place. Living so close to the site has left me feeling anxious, and I do not feel reassured that local family’s... Read more
Submitted by: Interested party
Date submitted: 6 August 2026
Redacted representation comment
Submitted by: Interested party
Date submitted: 6 August 2026
I am a Gosport resident who has previously volunteered at the previous Haslar Immigration Removal site, so I am not opposed in principle to some kind of provision in our area. However I would like to object to the proposed immigration accommodation centre in its current form. My concerns are about the impact this development will have on the local area rather than wider government immigration policy. This is a large development, and I'm not convinced the application shows that the surround... Read more
Submitted by: Interested party
Date submitted: 6 August 2026
The plans for the new site are completely impractical for the area it is situated. The transport links cannot sensibly support it. It’s in an already well established residential area and next to a conservation site. Local residents are already seeing the impact and house prices are being driven down or owners unable to sell. There has been no consultation for the new plans and clearly no practical evaluation on how this centre can operate in the location.
Submitted by: Interested party
Date submitted: 6 August 2026
I am vehemently opposed to this application. It has been created by faceless bureaucrats who have no idea what the area of Gosport is like. It is an extremely populated island peninsula with limited access and egress. Traffic is an overwhelming problem already. This particular are of Gosport is historically important and has many grade 2 listed buildings close by in Haslar and also in the original HMIC centre itself. The buildings planned are modern and adversely opposed to these historic bu... Read more
Submitted by: Interested party
Date submitted: 6 August 2026
Here's the letter with all em dashes removed: Objection to Crown Development Application: Haslar Immigration Removal Centre, Gosport - Phase 2 Expansion I am a resident of Gosport writing to formally object to the proposed Phase 2 expansion of Haslar Immigration Removal Centre, which would increase capacity from around 130 to up to 600 beds. 1. Inadequate consultation period This application has been given a consultation window of only four weeks, compared with the six weeks allowed fo... Read more
Submitted by: Interested party
Date submitted: 6 August 2026
I am shocked to find out these illegal migrants get 5 star accommodation and VIP treatment to dentist and doctors, they have a dedicated place to wash before they pray, did they get this in their home country No, there is also mention in the home office document that you will be providing transport for visitors to see the illegals. so why are you treating them better than HM forces Veterans or even serving HM forces, shame on the Conservatives and our local MP and for Labour for causing this ... Read more
Submitted by: Interested party
Date submitted: 6 August 2026
It’s concerning the amount of people expected to be accommodated at this facility. There has been no explanation on what would happen if the countries they are being returned too refuses for them. Criminals who have no right to be allowed in the UK, can not be housed in this facility indefinitely which could mean they will be allowed to roam freely across our local town which has already seen an increase in sexual assault cases, home break ins, ABH and assault cases. We can not allow 600 crimina... Read more
Submitted by: Interested party
Date submitted: 6 August 2026
I object to the proposal to expand Haslar into a 600-bed detention centre, adding up to 470 additional detention places before the refurbished 130-bed centre has even reopened or been assessed, and I am concerned about immigration detention, public accountability and climate risk. Immigration detention causes serious harm to detainees, and the effects are felt by families, communities, legal and advice services, health services and local people. Expanding Haslar would have serious human and comm... Read more
Submitted by: Interested party
Date submitted: 6 August 2026
I accept the necessity of the facility. However I consider that, given the residential area, it is proportionate to ensure that there is sufficient parking available on site for all staff and visitors to both enable efficient operation of the site but also ongoing good community relationships. A lack of parking is likely to be a friction point with residents, will erode goodwill, and potentially cause staffing difficulties for the site. Given there is ample space available to ensure appropr... Read more
Submitted by: Interested party
Date submitted: 6 August 2026
Yes
Submitted by: Interested party
Date submitted: 6 August 2026
Contains attachment(s)
Audrey Bandey on behalf of Audrey Bandey
Myself and my Daughter would like to attend a hearing. I am totally opposed to this development of the Haslar immigration Centre.Since the build started,there has been nothing but falsehoods & disturbance given to us.Had the site, remained the same,albeit with updated and refurbished buildings,for the same amount of detainees 120.There would of been little objection.To place 500 more onto the same footprint is totally unexceptable,The infrastructure is not big enough to hold that many people hu... Read more
Submitted by: Interested party
Date submitted: 6 August 2026
I object to the proposed development for the following reasons: 1. The health assessment fails to adequately describe how the current NHS services in Gosport, already stretched, will not be adversely impacted by the increased centre population of 600 inmates in phase 2. 2. The transport assessment fails to describe how the local, constricted road network (Fort Road, Clayhall Road, Haslar Road with its controlled one-way 'pneumonia' bridge) will cope with additional heavy traffic both during co... Read more
Submitted by: Interested party
Date submitted: 6 August 2026
I am writing to formally object to the above Crown planning application regarding the expansion of the Haslar Immigration Removal Centre to a 600-bed facility. While I recognize the national context of the application, I strongly object on the grounds of severe highway safety issues, infrastructure incapacity, and a lack of transparency regarding site viability.My objection focuses on the following Material Planning Considerations: 1. Severe Highway Safety and Capacity Pressures The Haslar s... Read more
Submitted by: Interested party
Date submitted: 6 August 2026