CROWN/2026/0000004 Written representations
Showing 251 to 260 of 260 representations, newest first.
Results per page 25 | 50 | 100Victoria Green on behalf of Oxfordshire County Archaeological Services
Dear Sir/Madam, Application no: CROWN/2026/0000004 Campsfield House IRC, Langford Lane, Kidlington, OX5 1RE The site lies in an area of archaeological interest and potential, in an area which has a range of features recorded in recent archaeological investigations. c. 550m to the southeast of the proposal site, cropmarks depicting probably late prehistoric settlement remains were recorded. These have been investigated as part of a recent archaeological evaluation and were found to contain ... Read more
Submitted by: Interested party
Date submitted: 23 June 2026
Stop forcing unwanted decisions on those you didn't even have the decency to consult. Sidelining local councils and the views of residents is the complete opposite of transparency and accountability. Nothing that is ever forced on the public is for their benefit. You only have to look at the recent tyranny of forcing(mandates) immune system damaging convid jabs. Coercion is NEVER consent. You're all sorry now but unfortunately it's the ordinary people who always pay the price for your id... Read more
Submitted by: Interested party
Date submitted: 21 June 2026
Please see response letter
Submitted by: Interested party
Date submitted: 15 June 2026
Contains attachment(s)
As a local resident, I am extremely against this development. All relevant local elected councils, including the planning authority Cherwell have made it clear that the Oxfordshire people do not want the expansion or the immigration detention centre at all, yet these local authorities have been bypassed. This is a sneaky move and is immoral. This project is not at all for national importance. Campsfield is run for profit by Mitie. This does not benefit our citizens, only shareholders.
Submitted by: Interested party
Date submitted: 15 June 2026
I wish to object to the planning application on the following grounds:- 1. Mitie provides poor value for money and in the past has cost the public purse i.e. abandoning it's contract with the John Radcliffe Hospital. 2. The adjacent Oxford University project was set up in the Greenbelt and its planning was allowed because it provides," High Quality jobs". This expansion provides low quality jobs even providing employment to inmates for very low pay. 3. Public Transport to the site is poor fo... Read more
Submitted by: Interested party
Date submitted: 15 June 2026
I object to the proposed expansion of Campsfield IDC. This would be a complete waste of money when the Home Office's own latest figures show there are vacant beds at Campsfield and throughout the system. In addition to the harm done to individuals by locking them up indefinitely, there would be harm to the surrounding area by increased traffic in a residential area and the visual impact of such an unwelcome facility in an area which aspires to be a beacon of innovation, technology and science. T... Read more
Submitted by: Interested party
Date submitted: 14 June 2026
All relevant local elected councils, including the planning authority Cherwell, have made it clear that Oxfordshire people do not want this expansion or indeed the immigration detention centre
Submitted by: Interested party
Date submitted: 14 June 2026
This facility needs to somewhere else. It is close to a residential area and will be detrimental to both social and environmental needs.
Submitted by: Interested party
Date submitted: 14 June 2026
As a nearby resident, I am commenting only on the local effects of the development. I do not intend to comment on the principle of immigration detention or the wider policy issues associated with the site. My observations relate solely to the impact on neighbouring residents and the opportunity to address existing amenity issues as part of the proposed development. My main concern is that the expansion should not increase existing impacts on neighbouring residential properties and, where poss... Read more
Submitted by: Interested party
Date submitted: 10 June 2026
This expansion gets my vote 100%. The UK is over-populated and personnel who have no legal right to be in the UK need to be removed from our territory. As they would be a flight risk it is correct to hold them in a secure centre until such time as they are deported. Absolutely this project should go ahead.
Submitted by: Interested party
Date submitted: 8 June 2026