Back to list

Date submitted

5 August 2026

Submitted by

Interested party

Many residents share deep concerns about the IRC proposals. From this viewpoint, the Home Office appears to have pushed ahead without following the proper planning process, leaving the community excluded from decisions that directly affect their homes and wellbeing. The lack of openness throughout the development has created a sense of mistrust, and many feel that key information has been withheld. There is particular frustration that the initial plans did not mention three‑storey blocks positioned only metres from existing houses, nor any indication that the facility would be expanded to a 600‑bed site. For people living nearby, this represents a dramatic and unexpected escalation. Traffic levels are another major worry. The area simply does not have the infrastructure to cope with the volume of vehicle movements expected each day. Residents fear this will cause long‑term disruption, safety issues, and a decline in quality of life. Some now feel unable to sell their homes, leaving them effectively trapped by circumstances they never agreed to. For two years, those living opposite the site have endured noise, dust, and constant activity from heavy machinery. Clay particles and dry conditions have created air quality concerns that many believe will have health consequences in the future. The delayed and inadequate installation of hoarding has only added to the sense that residents’ wellbeing has not been prioritised. It is understandable that people feel distressed and overwhelmed. Anyone would struggle if a development of this scale were placed directly in front of their home without meaningful consultation or mitigation.